2004 Citroen C3 vs. 2012 Volvo S80
To start off, 2012 Volvo S80 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo S80 (180 HP) has 92 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C3. (88 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S80 weights approximately 614 kg more than 2004 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C3 | 2012 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C3 | S80 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 180 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 67 L |