2004 Citroen C4 vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2004 Citroen C4 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C4 (135 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C4 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C4 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen C4 (314 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen C4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C4 | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C4 | 220 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |