2004 Citroen C4 vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2004 Citroen C4 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 944 kg more than 2004 Citroen C4.
Because 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C4 | 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Citroen | Rolls-Royce |
Model | C4 | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 6749 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1262 kg | 2206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 107 L |