2004 Citroen C4 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C4 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 440 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C4. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 719 kg more than 2004 Citroen C4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 597 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C4. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C4.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Citroen C4 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
Make Citroen Cadillac
Model C4 CTS-V
Year Released 2004 2013
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 108 HP 548 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 150 Nm 747 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78.5 mm 103 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 9.1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1195 kg 1914 kg
Vehicle Length 4270 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1884 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1422 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 47 L 68 L