2004 Citroen C5 vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Jeep CJ2A (59 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C5. (58 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Citroen C5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jeep CJ2A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C5. (115 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1949 Jeep CJ2A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 1949 Jeep CJ2A | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | C5 | CJ2A |
Year Released | 2004 | 1949 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2040 mm |