2004 Citroen C5 vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Jeep CJ (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C5. (57 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 306 kg more than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Citroen C5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C5. (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1953 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | C5 | CJ |
Year Released | 2004 | 1953 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2040 mm |