2004 Citroen C5 vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C5 (58 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen C5 (115 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C5 | R 360 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 355 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 22 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 63 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 55 L |