2004 Citroen C5 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C5 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen C5 (255 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | C5 | EJ |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |