2004 Citroen C5 vs. 1966 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C5 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1966 Ford Falcon. (106 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Falcon.

Because 1966 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen C5 (255 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Falcon. (188 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Citroen C5 1966 Ford Falcon
Make Citroen Ford
Model C5 Falcon
Year Released 2004 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 2782 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 255 Nm 188 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 75 mm 88.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 74.7 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 47 L 56 L