2004 Citroen C5 vs. 1968 Marcos 1600
To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Marcos 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Marcos 1600 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C5 (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1968 Marcos 1600. (88 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1968 Marcos 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 904 kg more than 1968 Marcos 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Marcos 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Marcos 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen C5 (314 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Marcos 1600. (130 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Marcos 1600. 2004 Citroen C5 has automatic transmission and 1968 Marcos 1600 has manual transmission. 1968 Marcos 1600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Citroen C5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Citroen C5 | 1968 Marcos 1600 | |
| Make | Citroen | Marcos |
| Model | C5 | 1600 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2179 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1666 kg | 762 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1070 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 45 L |
