2004 Citroen C5 vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C5 (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 593 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Citroen C5 | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | C5 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1448 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2010 mm |
