2004 Citroen C5 vs. 1980 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mercury Lynx (70 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C5. (58 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mercury Lynx should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1980 Mercury Lynx.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mercury Lynx (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C5. (115 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1980 Mercury Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 1980 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Citroen | Mercury |
Model | C5 | Lynx |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2400 mm |