2004 Citroen C5 vs. 1981 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1981 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C5 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1981 Mazda RX-7. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda RX-7.
Because 1981 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen C5 (255 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 1981 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C5 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 65 L |