2004 Citroen C5 vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 360 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C5 (115 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 196 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen C5 (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Citroen C5 | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | C5 | 360 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1749 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 58 L |
