2004 Citroen C5 vs. 1990 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1990 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mazda RX-7 (197 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C5. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C5.
Because 1990 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Mazda RX-7 (270 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C5. (255 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1990 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 1990 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C5 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1990 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 75 L |