2004 Citroen C5 vs. 2000 Ford TL-50
To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C5. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 317 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Because 2000 Ford TL-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TL-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C5. (112 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 2000 Ford TL-50 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C5 | TL-50 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1619 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 37 L |