2004 Citroen C5 vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 143 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C5. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 6 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C5. (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C5 | MPV |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 75 L |