2004 Citroen C5 vs. 2008 Toyota iQ
To start off, 2008 Toyota iQ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota iQ (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C5. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota iQ should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 759 kg more than 2008 Toyota iQ.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota iQ (118 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C5. (112 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota iQ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 2008 Toyota iQ | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | C5 | iQ |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 1329 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1619 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 2985 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2000 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.2 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 32 L |