2004 Citroen C5 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C5. (59 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C5. (110 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C5 | E-350 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2179 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.5 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 57 L |