2004 Citroen C5 vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C5. (58 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Citroen C5 has automatic transmission and 2011 Nissan Pixo has manual transmission. 2011 Nissan Pixo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Citroen C5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | C5 | Pixo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 68 HP |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.6 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2360 mm |