2004 Citroen C5 vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 2 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C5. (57 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 334 kg more than 2012 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 2 (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C5. (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C5 | 2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.3 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 43 L |