2004 Citroen C5 vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C5 (57 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 822 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen C5 (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Citroen C5 | 2012 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Citroen | Tata |
| Model | C5 | Nano |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 192 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 37 L |
