2004 Citroen C5 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 113 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Citroen C5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C5. (110 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C5 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Citroen | Mini |
Model | C5 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1591 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.5 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 47 L |