2004 Citroen Saxo vs. 1952 Renault Juva
To start off, 2004 Citroen Saxo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,003 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Renault Juva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Renault Juva weights approximately 11 kg more than 2004 Citroen Saxo.
Because 1952 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen Saxo | 1952 Renault Juva | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Saxo | Juva |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1003 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2360 mm |