2004 Citroen Saxo vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Citroen Saxo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Citroen Saxo. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen Saxo.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 66 (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen Saxo. (74 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen Saxo. 1979 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 2004 Citroen Saxo has manual transmission. 2004 Citroen Saxo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen Saxo | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Saxo | 66 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |