2004 Citroen Xsara vs. 1952 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2004 Citroen Xsara is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen Xsara (74 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Citroen Xsara | 1952 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Xsara | 12 M |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 37 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2500 mm |
