2004 Citroen Xsara vs. 1964 Mini MK I
To start off, 2004 Citroen Xsara is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen Xsara (108 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1964 Mini MK I. (34 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1964 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 619 kg more than 1964 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen Xsara (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen Xsara | 1964 Mini MK I | |
Make | Citroen | Mini |
Model | Xsara | MK I |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 34 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1237 kg | 618 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2040 mm |