2004 Citroen Xsara vs. 1966 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2004 Citroen Xsara is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,599 cc, 1966 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Toyota Crown (98 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1966 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen Xsara (206 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Toyota Crown. (200 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen Xsara | 1966 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Xsara | Crown |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2599 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |