2004 Citroen Xsara vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Citroen Xsara is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (74 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 251 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (116 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen Xsara | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Xsara | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 57 L |