2004 Citroen Xsara vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2

To start off, 2004 Citroen Xsara is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 360 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2.

Because 1976 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Citroen Xsara 1976 Mazda RX-2
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara RX-2
Year Released 2004 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 2292 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 94 HP 118 HP
Torque 135 Nm 157 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1320 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4280 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2480 mm