2004 Citroen Xsara vs. 1992 Holden Apollo

To start off, 2004 Citroen Xsara is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen Xsara (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 43 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen Xsara (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Citroen Xsara 1992 Holden Apollo
Make Citroen Holden
Model Xsara Apollo
Year Released 2004 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 134 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 172 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1248 kg 1205 kg
Vehicle Length 4190 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2610 mm