2004 Citroen Xsara vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2004 Citroen Xsara is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen Xsara (89 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 409 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen Xsara (206 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Citroen Xsara | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | Xsara | Midge |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1322 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |
