2004 Citroen Xsara vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen Xsara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen Xsara | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Xsara | Matrix |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 132 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |