2004 Citroen Xsara vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1272 kg more than 2004 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac SRX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen Xsara. 2013 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 2004 Citroen Xsara has manual transmission. 2004 Citroen Xsara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Citroen Xsara | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Citroen | Cadillac |
| Model | Xsara | SRX |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.5 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.6 seconds | 9.7 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 2520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4834 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1669 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2807 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |
