2004 Daewoo Evanda vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore

To start off, 2004 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 159 kg more than 2004 Daewoo Evanda.

Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Daewoo Evanda 1949 Hudson Commodore
Make Daewoo Hudson
Model Evanda Commodore
Year Released 2004 1949
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 4166 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 131 HP 128 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 76.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 114.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 6.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1497 kg 1656 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 5280 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1960 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 3160 mm