2004 Daewoo Evanda vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 757 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Daewoo Evanda | 1962 Renault 8 | |
Make | Daewoo | Renault |
Model | Evanda | 8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2280 mm |