2004 Daewoo Evanda vs. 1972 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 587 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Daewoo Evanda | 1972 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Daewoo | Mitsubishi |
Model | Evanda | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2360 mm |