2004 Daewoo Evanda vs. 1978 Mazda 626

To start off, 2004 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 452 kg more than 1978 Mazda 626.

Because 1978 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Daewoo Evanda 1978 Mazda 626
Make Daewoo Mazda
Model Evanda 626
Year Released 2004 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 1586 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 131 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1497 kg 1045 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4310 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2520 mm