2004 Daewoo Evanda vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZT would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2004 Daewoo Evanda. (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2004 Daewoo Evanda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 12 kg more than 2003 MG ZT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daewoo Evanda. (181 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daewoo Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Daewoo Evanda | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Daewoo | MG |
Model | Evanda | ZT |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2760 mm |