2004 Daewoo Evanda vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Daewoo Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Daewoo Evanda would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2004 Daewoo Evanda. (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Daewoo Evanda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 272 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daewoo Evanda. (181 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daewoo Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Daewoo Evanda | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
| Model | Evanda | 3 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 182 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 83.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |
