2004 Daewoo Kalos vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Daewoo Kalos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Daewoo Kalos would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1715 kg more than 2004 Daewoo Kalos.
Because 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 616 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daewoo Kalos. (104 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daewoo Kalos. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom has automatic transmission and 2004 Daewoo Kalos has manual transmission. 2004 Daewoo Kalos will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Daewoo Kalos | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Daewoo | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Kalos | Phantom |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 2670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 6092 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3820 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.5 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 100 L |