2004 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daewoo Lanos (74 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 40 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daewoo Lanos. (115 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Daewoo Lanos | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Daewoo | Holden |
Model | Lanos | FX |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1349 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2620 mm |