2004 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1958 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,170 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Daewoo Matiz | 1958 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Daewoo | Ford |
| Model | Matiz | 12 M |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 794 cc | 1170 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2500 mm |
