2004 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine would be higher. At 845 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Daewoo Matiz | 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine | |
Make | Daewoo | Willys-Overland |
Model | Matiz | Dauphine |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2280 mm |