2004 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2004 Daewoo Matiz. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2004 Daewoo Matiz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Clio (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Daewoo Matiz | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Daewoo | Renault |
Model | Matiz | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2480 mm |