2004 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Suzuki C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 499 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. (142 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Daewoo Rezzo | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
Make | Daewoo | Suzuki |
Model | Rezzo | C2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 284 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2240 mm |