2004 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2002 Ford Ka
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 211 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. (142 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Daewoo Rezzo | 2002 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Daewoo | Ford |
| Model | Rezzo | Ka |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 162 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 1136 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 42 L |
