2004 Daihatsu Copen vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Daihatsu Copen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Daihatsu Copen would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2004 Daihatsu Copen. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2004 Daihatsu Copen.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daihatsu Copen. (100 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daihatsu Copen.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Daihatsu Copen | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Nissan |
| Model | Copen | Micra |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 659 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 46 L |
