2004 Daihatsu Naked vs. 1966 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2004 Daihatsu Naked is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,183 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daihatsu Naked (63 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daihatsu Naked should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Taunus weights approximately 35 kg more than 2004 Daihatsu Naked.
Because 1966 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daihatsu Naked, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Daihatsu Naked | 1966 Ford Taunus | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
| Model | Naked | Taunus |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 658 cc | 1183 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 845 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 45 L |
