2004 Daihatsu Naked vs. 1970 Mazda 616
To start off, 2004 Daihatsu Naked is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda 616 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2004 Daihatsu Naked. (63 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 2004 Daihatsu Naked. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Mazda 616 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2004 Daihatsu Naked. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mazda 616 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daihatsu Naked. (107 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1970 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daihatsu Naked.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Daihatsu Naked | 1970 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Naked | 616 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 658 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.5 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2480 mm |